{"id":344417,"date":"2024-10-20T00:11:23","date_gmt":"2024-10-20T00:11:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/bs-en-169912018\/"},"modified":"2024-10-25T23:33:49","modified_gmt":"2024-10-25T23:33:49","slug":"bs-en-169912018","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/bsi\/bs-en-169912018\/","title":{"rendered":"BS EN 16991:2018"},"content":{"rendered":"
This European Standard specifies the Risk-Based Inspection Framework (RBIF) and gives guidelines for Risk-Based Inspection and Maintenance (RBIM) in hydrocarbon and chemical process industries, power generation and other industries where RBI is applicable. Although RBIF encompasses both inspection and maintenance, this document focuses primarily on Risk-Based Inspection (RBI) and its applicability within the context of RBIM. The RBIF thereby supports optimization of operations and maintenance as well as asset integrity management.<\/p>\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2<\/td>\n | undefined <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
9<\/td>\n | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
12<\/td>\n | 4 Abbreviated terms <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
13<\/td>\n | 5 The RBI framework 5.1 RBIF principles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
14<\/td>\n | 5.2 RBIF requirements 5.2.1 General requirements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
15<\/td>\n | 5.2.2 Plant and process documentation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
16<\/td>\n | 5.2.3 Personnel requirements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
17<\/td>\n | 5.2.4 Requirements for performing CoF analysis 5.2.4.1 General requirements 5.2.4.2 Recognized models 5.2.4.3 Requirements related to CoFsafety <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
18<\/td>\n | 5.2.4.4 Requirements related to CoFhealth 5.2.4.5 Requirements related to CoFenvironment 5.2.4.6 Requirements related to CoFbusiness 5.2.5 Requirements for performing PoF analysis 5.2.5.1 General requirements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
19<\/td>\n | 5.2.5.2 Recognized models 5.2.5.3 Conservatism of simplified approaches 5.2.5.4 Auditability of results 5.2.5.5 Multi-level approaches (screening – detailed, in level of asset hierarchy) 5.2.5.6 Additional aspects to be considered <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
20<\/td>\n | 5.2.6 Requirements for risk assessment 5.3 RBIF within the overall management system <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
21<\/td>\n | 5.4 Compatibility with other known approaches 6 The RBIF process <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
23<\/td>\n | 7 Initial analysis and planning 7.1 General description and scope 7.1.1 General 7.1.2 Planning and the preliminary analysis 7.1.3 Definition of objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
24<\/td>\n | 7.1.4 Definition of systems, sub-systems (loops) and equipment to be considered 7.1.5 Definition of the scope of analysis 7.1.6 Definition of data sources available <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
25<\/td>\n | 7.1.7 Definition of regulations to be considered 7.1.8 Team specifications <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
26<\/td>\n | 7.1.9 Tools to be used 7.1.10 Accuracy of the acceptance of the methodology 7.2 Requirements 7.3 Inputs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
27<\/td>\n | 7.4 Procedure 7.5 Output 7.6 Warnings and applicability limits <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
28<\/td>\n | 8 Data collection and validation 8.1 General description and scope 8.2 Requirements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
29<\/td>\n | 8.3 Input 8.3.1 General 8.3.2 Collect and validate documented data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
30<\/td>\n | 8.3.3 Collect relevant non-documented data 8.4 Procedure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
31<\/td>\n | 8.5 Output 8.6 Warnings and applicability limits <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
32<\/td>\n | 9 Multilevel risk analysis (ranging from screening to detailed) 9.1 General description and scope 9.2 Risk analysis – screening level 9.2.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
33<\/td>\n | 9.2.2 Inputs 9.2.3 Procedure 9.2.4 Output <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
34<\/td>\n | 9.3 Risk analysis – detailed assessment 9.3.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
35<\/td>\n | 9.3.2 Requirements 9.3.3 Inputs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
36<\/td>\n | 9.3.4 Procedure 9.3.4.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
37<\/td>\n | 9.3.4.2 Risk Assessment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
38<\/td>\n | 9.3.5 Output <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
40<\/td>\n | 10 Decision making\/action plan 10.1 General description and scope 10.2 Requirements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
41<\/td>\n | 10.3 Inputs 10.4 Procedure 10.4.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
42<\/td>\n | 10.4.2 Define degradation groups and relevant susceptible areas <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
43<\/td>\n | 10.5 Output <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
44<\/td>\n | 10.6 Warnings and applicability limits 11 Execution and reporting 11.1 General description and scope <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
45<\/td>\n | 11.2 Input 11.3 Procedure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
48<\/td>\n | 11.4 Output 11.5 Warning\/ application limits 12 Performance review\/Evergreening phase 12.1 General description and scope <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
49<\/td>\n | 12.2 Requirements 12.3 Inputs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
50<\/td>\n | 12.4 Procedure 12.4.1 General 12.4.2 Work process efficiency benchmarking <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
52<\/td>\n | Annex A (informative)Assessments A.1 Example of a multilevel RBI analysis in power industry <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
56<\/td>\n | A.2 Example of screening and detailed risk assessment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
60<\/td>\n | A.3 Reliability of risk assessment results in the screening phase <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
61<\/td>\n | A.4 Example of assessment of damage\/failure probability <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
62<\/td>\n | A.5 Example of probability and consequence factors for qualitative analysis on the screening and detailed levels <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
63<\/td>\n | A.6 Examples of types of in-service damage and their specifications <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
65<\/td>\n | A.7 Example of various types of damage and their specifications in relation to hierarchical structure of the plant <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
67<\/td>\n | A.8 Example of classification of type of damage vs. prioritized methods of inspection <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
70<\/td>\n | A.9 Example for determination of PoF <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
72<\/td>\n | A.10 Example for determination of CoF <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
78<\/td>\n | A.11 Example of KPIs and objectives for selection <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
81<\/td>\n | A.12 Example of a RBI management system evaluation questionnaire [34] <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
83<\/td>\n | A.13 Example of formulation and degradation of components, structures and systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Risk-based inspection framework<\/b><\/p>\n |