BS IEC SRD 63200:2021
$215.11
Definition of extended SGAM smart energy grid reference architecture model
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2021 | 72 |
This document, which is a Systems Reference Deliverable, defines the framework elements, associated ontology, and modelling methodology for designing the Smart energy Grid Reference Architecture using the Smart Grid Architecture Model (SGAM), with potential expansion to describe the interaction between the grid and heat/gas systems, and including easily understandable examples.
This document also provides a machine level representation of the concepts associated with the SGAM in the form of an ontology provided in the form of diagrams in Annex A, as well as in the form of a code component. Thus, this document is associated with a code component presented as a ZIP file package containing:
-
a file describing the content of the package (IECManifest.xml);
-
the OWL representation of the ontology of the concepts introduced in this document;
-
The same content as the OWL content, but exposed as a series of HTML files, which any browser can open for easy reading.
Considering that such a code component is redistribuable (EULA license), and can also evolve, it is accessible to all actors of the supply chain through the IEC website at: http://www.iec.ch/sycsmartenergy/supportingdocuments under the name IEC_SRD_63200.OWL.2021A.Full.zip.
The latest version/release of the document will be found in the future by selecting the file for the code component with the highest value for VersionStateInfo, e.g. IEC_SRD_63200.OWL.{VersionStateInfo}.Full.
Finally, compared to past publications related to the SGAM (mostly by CEN-CENELEC-ETSI CG-SEG), this document provides in addition:
-
further refinement on main roles, to avoid possible confusions between them;
-
extensions for supporting interfaces for other energies;
-
a seamless and detailed integration with the IEC 62559 and IEC 62913 series;
-
formal representations in UML and OWL ontology formats.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
2 | undefined |
4 | CONTENTS |
8 | FOREWORD |
10 | INTRODUCTION |
11 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms 3.1 Terms and definitions |
15 | 3.2 Abbreviated terms |
16 | 4 Interoperability in the context of the smart energy grid 4.1 Overview |
17 | Figures Figure 1 – Slicing through the SGAM at each layer |
18 | 4.2 General 4.3 Interoperability definition 4.4 Interoperability categories Figure 2 – Definition of interoperability – interoperable systems performing a function |
19 | 5 SGAM framework elements 5.1 General 5.2 SGAM interoperability layers 5.2.1 General Figure 3 – Interoperability categories defined by GWAC |
20 | 5.2.2 Business layer 5.2.3 Function layer 5.2.4 Information layer 5.2.5 Communication layer Figure 4 – Grouping into interoperability layers |
21 | 5.2.6 Component layer 5.2.7 Architecture element grouping and interactions 5.3 SGAM component plane Tables Table 1 – Interoperability layer elements and interactions |
22 | 5.4 SGAM domains Figure 5 – SGAM component plane – domains and hierarchical zones Table 2 – SGAM domains |
23 | 5.5 SGAM zones Table 3 – SGAM zones |
24 | 5.6 SGAM framework |
25 | 5.7 Extension of SGAM for the interaction in the areas of Heat and Gas Figure 6 – The SGAM framework |
26 | Figure 7 – The interaction model of three energies’ component layer |
27 | Figure 8 – The separated domains model Figure 9 – Component layer of the SGAM with separated domains |
28 | 6 Designing procedure using the SGAM 6.1 The SGAM methodology 6.1.1 General 6.1.2 Principles |
29 | 6.2 Mapping of use cases to SGAM framework 6.2.1 General |
30 | 6.2.2 Step 1: Use case analysis Figure 10 – Interactions between the use case methodologyand the Smart Grid Architecture Model Figure 11 – Use case mapping process to SGAM |
31 | 6.2.3 Step 2: Development of business layer 6.2.4 Development of the other layers Figure 12 – Defining Smart-Grid Requirements methodology |
32 | 6.3 Business map |
33 | 6.4 Functional architecture 6.5 Information architecture 6.5.1 General 6.5.2 Integration technology Table 4 – Main elements hosted at business layer Table 5 – Main elements hosted at functional layer |
35 | 6.5.3 Data models 6.5.4 Interfaces or abstract communication services |
36 | 6.5.5 Software module architecture 6.5.6 Information layer typical elements 6.6 Communication architecture Table 6 – Main elements hosted at information layer |
37 | 6.7 Component architecture Table 7 – Main elements hosted at communication layer Table 8 – Main elements hosted at component layer |
38 | Annex A (informative)Ontology A.1 Underlying UML model of the ontology A.1.1 General A.1.2 From business layer to systems and architectures |
39 | A.1.3 Business and system use cases, roles, actors and SGAM Figure A.1 – UML diagram – from business to systems and architecture |
40 | Figure A.2 – UML diagram – SGAM versus roles, actors and use cases |
41 | A.1.4 Business map and functional architecture A.1.5 Functional and information architectures Figure A.3 – UML diagram – Business map and functionalarchitecture mapped over the SGAM |
42 | A.1.6 Communication and information architectures Figure A.4 – UML diagram – functional and informationarchitectures mapped over the SGAM |
43 | A.1.7 Physical and communication architectures Figure A.5 – UML diagram – communication and informationarchitectures mapped over the SGAM |
44 | A.2 OWL representation of the ontology and associated diagrams Figure A.6 – UML diagram – physical and communicationarchitectures mapped over the SGAM |
45 | Figure A.7 – SGAM ontology structure summary |
46 | Annex B (informative)Practical cases of use of the SGAM (practical manual) B.1 The interaction of DERs and HVAC under the control of BEMS B.1.1 General B.1.2 Breaking down customer premises domains into subdomains |
47 | Figure B.1 – BEMS control of DERs and HVAC equipment in a commercial building which enables islanding operation and demand response (component layer) Table B 1 – Actor (stakeholder) roles associated to the exampleon the interaction of DERs and HVAC |
48 | B.1.3 Considered interactions in function layer Figure B.2 –BEMS controls of DERs and HVAC equipment in a commercial building which enables islanding operation and demand response (communication layer) |
49 | B.1.4 Considered interactions in information layer Figure B 3 – Mapping to information layer related tothe example of the integration of DER and HVAC Table B 2 – Interactions between BEMS Servers and related premises Table B 3 – Interactions between BEMS Servers and related premises |
50 | B.2 Mapping a conceptual model onto the SGAM B.2.1 European Smart Grid conceptual model (extract from [16]) |
51 | B.2.2 Main elements of this Smart Grid conceptual model Figure B.4 – European Smart Grid conceptual model |
52 | B.2.3 Transposition into the SGAM concepts Figure B 5 – Reworked Smart Grid conceptual model based on Figure B.4 |
53 | B.2.4 Final mapping over the SGAM (excluding the generation side) Figure B 6 – Main stakeholders’ interactions (simplified view) –Mapping the conceptual model over the SGAM one |
54 | B.3 Smart grid user interfaces characterization B.3.1 General B.3.2 Identifying the main interactions Figure B.7 – European conceptual model mapped over the SGAM |
55 | Figure B.8 – SGAM figuring the Smart Grid user interface and its interfaces |
56 | B.3.3 Formalization of considered interactions Figure B.9 – Simplified interactions between Grid usersand the grid (except the market places interactions) |
57 | Table B.4 – Main (direct) Smart Grid user interactions |
58 | B.3.4 (Example) Mapping the interfaces between the grid users and the Utilities Table B.5 – Main (indirect) Smart Grid user interactions Table B.6 – Interfaces under consideration between the grid users and the Utilities |
59 | Table B.7 – Supported business processes and use cases |
60 | Figure B.10 – Interfacing the utility with Grid users hosting DER unitsmapped to the SGAM component layer |
61 | Figure B.11 – Interfacing the utility with Grid users hosting DER unitsmapped to the SGAM communication layer |
62 | Figure B.12 – Interfacing the utility with Grid users hosting DER unitsmapped to the SGAM information layer |
63 | Figure B.13 – IEC entities involved in interfacing the utilitywith Grid users hosting DER Units |
65 | Figure B.14 – SGAM mapping of a multi-owner microgridperceived as distribution grid user |
66 | B.4 Breaking down the Smart Grid domains into systems B.4.1 Overview Figure B.15 – SGAM mapping of a multi-owner microgrid perceivedby the participants as a small distribution grid |
67 | B.4.2 Asset management systems Figure B.16 – Overview on functional clusters for SGAM in the Smart Grid |
68 | B.4.3 Process Control systems (DMS, EMS, DER, CEMS) B.4.4 Wide Area Monitoring Systems (WAMS) |
69 | B.4.5 Grid automation systems B.4.6 Flexible Alternating Current Transmission Systems (FACTS) B.4.7 Forecast systems B.4.8 Market systems |
70 | B.4.9 Smart metering systems B.4.10 Geographical Information Systems B.4.11 ICT connectivity services and data integration B.4.12 Security |
71 | Bibliography |