{"id":440878,"date":"2024-10-20T08:18:03","date_gmt":"2024-10-20T08:18:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/bsi-pd-iec-guide-1152023-tc\/"},"modified":"2024-10-26T15:29:58","modified_gmt":"2024-10-26T15:29:58","slug":"bsi-pd-iec-guide-1152023-tc","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/bsi\/bsi-pd-iec-guide-1152023-tc\/","title":{"rendered":"BSI PD IEC GUIDE 115:2023 – TC"},"content":{"rendered":"
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1<\/td>\n | 30480450 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
47<\/td>\n | A-30473229 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
48<\/td>\n | undefined <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
50<\/td>\n | English CONTENTS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
51<\/td>\n | FOREWORD <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
53<\/td>\n | INTRODUCTION <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
54<\/td>\n | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms, definitions and symbols 3.1 Terms and definitions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
56<\/td>\n | 3.2 Symbols 4 Application of measurement uncertainty principles 4.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
57<\/td>\n | 4.2 Background <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
58<\/td>\n | 4.3 Measurement uncertainty principles \u2013 Application of procedures Figure 1 \u2013 Application of simple acceptance <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
59<\/td>\n | 4.4 Reporting statements of conformity <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
60<\/td>\n | Annex A (informative)Measurement uncertainty calculations for product conformity assessment testing A.1 Overview A.2 Guidance on making measurement uncertainty calculations A.2.1 General principles A.2.2 Uncertainty estimation approach A.2.3 Type A evaluation A.2.4 Type B evaluation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
61<\/td>\n | A.2.5 Individual uncertainties A.2.6 Summary of steps when estimating uncertainty Tables Table A.1 \u2013 Type B uncertainties <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
64<\/td>\n | A.3 Measurement uncertainty examples A.3.1 General A.3.2 Example 1 Table A.2 \u2013 Temperature rise significant influencing factors <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
65<\/td>\n | A.3.3 Example 2 Table A.3 \u2013 Temperature rise influencing factors to the measured value Table A.4 \u2013 Temperature rise uncertainty budget <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
66<\/td>\n | A.3.4 Example 3 Table A.5 \u2013 Input test uncertainty budget <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
67<\/td>\n | A.3.5 Example 4 Table A.6 \u2013 Input power test uncertainty budget <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
68<\/td>\n | A.3.6 Example 5 Table A.7 \u2013 Leakage current measurement uncertainty budget <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
69<\/td>\n | Table A.8 \u2013 Caliper gauge uncertainty budget <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
70<\/td>\n | A.3.7 Example 6 Table A.9 \u2013 Torque measurement uncertainty budget <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
72<\/td>\n | Bibliography <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Tracked Changes. Application of measurement uncertainty to conformity assessment activities in the electrotechnical sector<\/b><\/p>\n |