{"id":323828,"date":"2024-10-19T22:26:22","date_gmt":"2024-10-19T22:26:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/bsi-pd-iso-tr-371212017\/"},"modified":"2024-10-25T21:01:11","modified_gmt":"2024-10-25T21:01:11","slug":"bsi-pd-iso-tr-371212017","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/bsi\/bsi-pd-iso-tr-371212017\/","title":{"rendered":"BSI PD ISO\/TR 37121:2017"},"content":{"rendered":"
This document provides an inventory of existing guidelines and approaches on sustainable development and resilience in cities.<\/p>\n
This document focuses on resilience understood as the ability of a city, system, community, local government or society exposed to hazards to resist, absorb, accommodate to and recover from the effects of a hazard in a timely and efficient manner, including through the preservation and restoration of its essential basic structures and functions.<\/p>\n
Resilience indicators are intended to assess the extent to which cities are helping residents, businesses, institutions, and infrastructure resist, absorb, accommodate to and recover from the effects of hazards in a timely and efficient manner.<\/p>\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
9<\/td>\n | Foreword <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
10<\/td>\n | Introduction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
11<\/td>\n | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions 4 Compilation of guidelines and approaches 4.1 ASEAN\/ESC model cities programme <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
12<\/td>\n | 4.2 Citizen\u2019s guide to biosphere eco-cities: Finding a balance between people and nature for your city and countryside 4.3 User\u2019s manual for the city biodiversity index <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
13<\/td>\n | 4.4 Eco2 cities guide: Ecological cities as economic cities 4.5 European common indicators: Towards a local sustainability profile <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
14<\/td>\n | 4.6 Global urban indicators\u00a0\u2014 Selected statistics: monitoring the habitat agenda and the millennium development goals 4.7 Cities and green growth: A conceptual framework <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
15<\/td>\n | 4.8 Reference framework for sustainable cities (RFSC): Testing results and recommendations 4.9 Eco-model city project (EMCP): Regional revitalization project, eco-model cities leading the transformation to the low-carbon society <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
16<\/td>\n | 4.10 \u00c9coQuartier 4.11 Pearl rating system for Estidama: Emirate of Abu Dhabi <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
17<\/td>\n | 4.12 Green communities assistance kit 4.13 China\u2019s development of low-carbon eco-cities and associated indicator systems 4.14 National eco-garden city evaluation standards <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
18<\/td>\n | 4.15 Sustainable approach for social housing in Brazil (Selo Casa Azul CAIXA) 4.16 Public environmental accounting: International context, trends and concrete examples [City and Local Environmental Accounting and Reporting (CLEAR)] <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
19<\/td>\n | 4.17 Making EcoDistricts: Concepts and methods for advancing sustainability in neighbourhoods 4.18 GreenClimateCities program: Pathway to urban low-carbon development 4.19 Tianjin eco-city <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
20<\/td>\n | 4.20 Green City index: Summary of the green city index research series 4.21 How smart is your city? Helping cities measure progress <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
21<\/td>\n | 4.22 Citizen\u2019s guide to LEED\u00ae for neighbourhood development: How to tell if development is smart and green 4.23 CLIMATE+ development program: Framework for climate positive communities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
22<\/td>\n | 4.24 Comprehensive manual for the community capital scan 4.25 Enterprise green communities criteria 4.26 Foundation for sustainable area development: Assessments for area developments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
23<\/td>\n | 4.27 Global city indicators facility briefing documents 4.28 International eco-city framework and standards <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
24<\/td>\n | 4.29 Living building challenge 2.1: Visionary path to a restorative future 4.30 Common international targets <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
25<\/td>\n | 4.31 SlimCity: Cross-industry public-private initiative on urban sustainability 4.32 Sustainability Tools for Assessing and Rating (STAR) community rating system 4.33 Sustainable Cities Index 2010: Ranking the 20 largest British cities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
26<\/td>\n | 4.34 Sustainable communities program 4.35 Sustainable cities program <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
27<\/td>\n | 4.36 BREEAM communities\u00a0\u2014 Technical manual 4.37 Comprehensive assessment system for built environment efficiency (CASBEE\u00ae) for Cities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
28<\/td>\n | 4.38 German Sustainable Building Council 4.39 Eco-city development index system <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
29<\/td>\n | 4.40 Green star communities: Guide for local government 4.41 IGBC green townships (for townships and large developments) rating system\u00a0\u2014 Pilot version abridged reference guide <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
30<\/td>\n | 4.42 LEED\u00ae for neighbourhood development 4.43 Environmental accounting for people and places: Resources and Energy Analysis Programme (REAP) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
31<\/td>\n | 4.44 Cities and biodiversity outlook\u00a0\u2014 Action and policy: Global assessment of the links between urbanization, biodiversity, and ecosystem services 4.45 Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 4.46 UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
32<\/td>\n | 4.47 Global competitiveness report 2013 to 2014 4.48 Partnering for service excellence: Performance measurement report 4.49 Meeting the challenge of climate change: TRCA action plan for the living city <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
33<\/td>\n | 4.50 2012 EPI: environmental performance index and pilot trend environmental performance index 4.51 2012 Global cities index and emerging cities outlook 4.52 State of the world\u2019s cities 2012\/2013: Prosperity of cities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
34<\/td>\n | 4.53 Wealthier, healthier cities: How climate change action is giving us wealthier, healthier cities 4.54 New York City local law 84 benchmarking report 4.55 BREEAM-NL Area development\u00a0\u2014 Label for sustainable area development: Technical manual <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
35<\/td>\n | 4.56 Capacity building to integrate disaster risk reduction into coastal management in Indonesia 4.57 GHG protocol for community-scale greenhouse gas emissions (GPC) 4.58 UK sustainable development indicators <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
36<\/td>\n | 4.59 PAS\u00a02070 \u2014 Specification for the assessment of greenhouse gas emissions of a city: Direct plus supply chain, and consumption-based methodologies 4.60 Water sector performance indicator system (WS-PIS) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
37<\/td>\n | 4.61 Climate change adaptation-related indicators 4.62 The UK government sustainable development strategy 4.63 Ecological footprints of Canadian municipalities and regions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
38<\/td>\n | 4.64 Indicators of disaster risk and risk management: Program for Latin America and the Caribbean summary report (second edition) 4.65 Cities preparing for climate change: Study of six urban regions 4.66 Indicators for sustainability: How cities are monitoring and evaluating their success <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
39<\/td>\n | 4.67 Climate change adaptation indicators: Logic framework assessment and indicator analysis of Sida\u2019s bilateral and regional contributions under the framework of the climate change initiative 4.68 London\u2019s quality of life indicators: 2012 report 4.69 Measuring urban sustainability: Analysis of the European Green Capital Award 2010 and 2011 application round <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
40<\/td>\n | 4.70 Measuring city sustainability: Project Houston 4.71 Investing in sustainable growth: 2012 Rotterdam sustainability monitor 4.72 National Forest City <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
41<\/td>\n | 4.73 Construction index for ecological cities 4.74 Management referential system for a sustainable management operation (R\u00e9f\u00e9rentiel du Syst\u00e8me de Management d\u2019une Op\u00e9ration d\u2019am\u00e9nagement durable) 4.75 How to integrate and determine the value of the three sustainable development aspects from the conception to the development of a project (Comment int\u00e9grer et valoriser les 3 aspects du d\u00e9veloppement durable de la conception \u00e0 la r\u00e9alisation d\u2019un pro <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
42<\/td>\n | 4.76 From strategy to evaluation: keys to succeed in the local Agenda 21\u00a0\u2014 Referential for the evaluation of territorial sustainable development projects (De la strat\u00e9gie \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9valuation: des cl\u00e9s pour r\u00e9ussir un Agenda 21 local\u00a0\u2014 R\u00e9f\u00e9rentiel pour l\u2019\u00e9valua 4.77 Territorial Sustainable Development Projects and Local Agenda 21 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
43<\/td>\n | 4.78 Referential: A Sustainable Development for Paris (R\u00e9f\u00e9rential: Un Am\u00e9nagement Durable Pour Paris) 4.79 Sustainable development indicators: Indicators for the sustainable development national strategy 2010\u20132013 (Les indicateurs de d\u00e9veloppement durable: Les indicateurs de la strat\u00e9gie nationale de d\u00e9veloppement durable 2010\u20132013) 4.80 Sustainable development indicators for the evaluation of urban renewal projects: INDI model \u2013 RU 2015 (Des indicateurs de developpement durable pour l\u2019evaluation des projets de renouvellement urbain: Le mod\u00e8le INDI \u2013 RU 2005) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
44<\/td>\n | 4.81 Some regional approaches and indicators and some indicators related to social cohesion (Quelques d\u00e9marches et indicateurs r\u00e9gionaux and Quelques indicateurs en lien avec la coh\u00e9sion sociale) 4.82 Reference framework for sustainable cities 4.83 Urban sustainable development diagnostic (Diagnostic developpement durable urbain) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
45<\/td>\n | 4.84 Guide for environmental quality in architecture and urbanism (Guide de la qualit\u00e9 environnementale dans l\u2019architecture et l\u2019urbanisme) 4.85 Sustainable cities and neighbourhoods (Ville and quartiers durables) 4.86 Baro\u2019Metropole: Our Territory in Focus (Baro\u2019Metropole: Notre Territoire \u00e0 la Loupe) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
46<\/td>\n | 4.87 Eco-neighbourhoods Charter: Project subject to consultation and experimentation (Charte des \u00e9co quartiers: Project soumis \u00e0 concertation et exp\u00e9rimentation) 4.88 Charter for sustainable development and habitat (Charte de l\u2019am\u00e9nagement et de l\u2019habitat durables) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
47<\/td>\n | 4.89 UNISDR Disaster Resilience Scorecard for Cities 4.90 UNISDR Indicators of progress <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
48<\/td>\n | 4.91 UNISDR Post-2015 Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction: A proposal for monitoring progress <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
49<\/td>\n | 4.92 UNISDR local government self-assessment tool 4.93 Making Cities Resilient Report 2012 (UNISDR) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
50<\/td>\n | 4.94 UNISDR Ten New Essentials for Making Cities Resilient <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
51<\/td>\n | 4.95 University of Notre Dame Global Adaptation Index <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
52<\/td>\n | 4.96 Resilient Cities Research Report (Grosvenor) 4.97 City Resilience Framework <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
53<\/td>\n | 4.98 2014 FM Global Resilience Index 4.99 Global Climate Risk Index 2015 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
54<\/td>\n | 4.100 Index for Risk Management \u2014 InfoRM <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
55<\/td>\n | 4.101 Risk Reduction Index in West Africa <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
56<\/td>\n | 4.102 Toolkit for Resilient Cities\u00a0\u2014 Infrastructure, Technology and Urban Planning 4.103 The Oregon Resilience Plan <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
57<\/td>\n | 4.104 Planetary Boundaries Framework 4.105 Doughnut economics <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
58<\/td>\n | 4.106 Recovery Strategy for Greater Christchurch <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
59<\/td>\n | 4.107 Private Sector Investment Decisions in Building and Construction: Increasing, Managing and Transferring Risks: Case study of Lagos, Nigeria 4.108 Tourism Investment Choices and Flood Risk: Illustrative Case Study on Denarau Island Resort in Fiji 4.109 Flood risk management and the roles of the private sector in England <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
60<\/td>\n | 4.110 The Value of Seismic Risk Mitigation in Canterbury, New Zealand 4.111 Uncorrected land-use planning highlighted by flooding: The Alba case study (Piedmont, Italy) 4.112 Private Sector Investment Decisions in Building and Construction: Increasing, Managing, and Transferring Risks: A Case Study of Thailand <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
61<\/td>\n | 4.113 UNISDR Case Study Report 4.114 REDi Rating System 4.115 IFRC Framework for Community Resilience <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
62<\/td>\n | 4.116 Copenhagen Climate Adaptation Plan <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
63<\/td>\n | 4.117 Risk-Based Land-Use Guide 4.118 Enhancing Distribution Resiliency 4.119 Smart City Pilot Project <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
64<\/td>\n | 4.120 Haimian City Pilot Project 4.121 Low-carbon regions and cities experimental project <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
65<\/td>\n | 4.122 Guide for comprehensive assessment of local government 4.123 Spanish Sustainable Development Strategy 4.124 Spanish Standardization Work Programme <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
66<\/td>\n | 4.125 Gradual Development of Austrian Smart City Profiles 5 Analysis of indicators 5.1 ISO\u00a037120 Gap analysis \u2014 Resilience indicators <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
69<\/td>\n | 5.2 Analysis and correlation of guidelines and approaches with purposes and issues from ISO\u00a037101 5.2.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
70<\/td>\n | 5.2.2 Reference framework for European sustainable cities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
73<\/td>\n | 5.2.3 Baro Metropole (City of Rennes) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
76<\/td>\n | 5.2.4 Reference framework for territorial sustainable development projects and local Agenda\u00a021 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
78<\/td>\n | 5.2.5 Green communities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
80<\/td>\n | 5.2.6 Urban indicators guidelines <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
83<\/td>\n | 5.2.7 Low-carbon eco-cities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
84<\/td>\n | 5.2.8 Star community rating system <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
87<\/td>\n | 5.3 Analysis of CASBEE\u00ae guidelines and approaches 5.3.1 CASBEE\u00ae for urban development <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
90<\/td>\n | 5.3.2 CASBEE\u00ae for cities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
92<\/td>\n | 5.3.3 CASBEE\u00ae for market promotion\u00a0\u2014 Reflecting UNEP FI PWG\u2019s support for concise metrics <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
95<\/td>\n | 5.4 Analysis and correlation of UNISDR ten new essentials with ISO\u00a037120 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
102<\/td>\n | 6 Selection of indicators 6.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
103<\/td>\n | 6.2 Collection of information 6.3 Statistical considerations: Time series, missing data and interpretation in context 6.3.1 General <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
104<\/td>\n | 6.3.2 Time series 6.3.3 Missing data 6.3.4 Interpretation in context 6.4 Priorities and approaches for individual cities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
106<\/td>\n | Bibliography <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Sustainable development in communities. Inventory of existing guidelines and approaches on sustainable development and resilience in cities<\/b><\/p>\n |