“Proceedings of the 2008 International Low Impact Development Conference, held in Seattle, Washington, November 16-19, 2008. Sponsored by the Low Impact Development Technical Committee of the Urban Water Resources Research Council of the Environmental and Water Resources Institute of ASCE. This collection contains 121 papers reporting on new and continuing research, developments, and community adoption of Low Impact Development (LID) throughout the United States and other parts of the world. These papers address a very broad range of topics that are relevant to sustainable approach to stormwater management using LID technology. Topics include: LID and sustainability; codes, regulations, constraints, guidelines; recent monitoring\/performance findings; computational methods; advances in LID best-management practices design methods\u00e2\u20ac\u201dlessons learned; site design considerations; LID incentives for new development; watershed retrofit with LID; education, training outreach; and long-term performance, maintenance. This proceedings is useful to student and academics involved in environmental engineering and low impact development, landscape architects, soil scientists, design professionals, and water program administrators.”<\/p>\n
| PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1<\/td>\n | Cover <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 7<\/td>\n | Table of Contents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 17<\/td>\n | Advances in LID BMP Design Methods Bioretention Design and Consideration An Approach to Analyze the Hydrologic Effects of Rain Gardens <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 26<\/td>\n | An Investigation of Rain Garden Planting Mixture Performance and the Implication for Design <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 36<\/td>\n | Cold Climate Issues for Bioretention: Assessing Impacts of Salt and Aggregate Application on Plant Health, Media Clogging, and Groundwater Quality <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 46<\/td>\n | Design and Modeling of Bioretention for Hydromodification Control: An Assessment of Alternative Model Representations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 56<\/td>\n | Design of Integrated Bioretention-Infiltration Systems for Urban Retrofits <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 66<\/td>\n | Lessons Learned from Monitoring of a Natural Drainage System in West Seattle\u2019s High Point Neighborhood <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 75<\/td>\n | Ecoroof \/ Greenroof Monitoring A Laboratory Comparison of Green-Roof Runoff Water Quality <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 85<\/td>\n | A Study of Green Roof Hydrologic Performance in the Cascadia Region <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 95<\/td>\n | Early-Life Roof Runoff Quality: Green vs. Traditional Roofs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 105<\/td>\n | Flow Monitoring of Three Ecoroofs in Portland, Oregon <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 115<\/td>\n | The Stormwater Control Potential of Green Roofs in Seattle <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 125<\/td>\n | Green Infrastructure LID As a Tool to Transform a DOT’s Design Manual and Method of Doing Business: The Anacostia Urban Design Standards and the Green Highway Movement <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 136<\/td>\n | Green Roofs Green Envelopes: Contribution of Green Roofs, Green Fa\u00e7ades, and Green Streets to Reducing Stormwater Runoff, CO2 Emissions, and Energy Demand in Cities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 144<\/td>\n | A Deterministic Lumped Dynamic Green Roof Model <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 158<\/td>\n | Quantifying Evapotranspiration Rates for New Zealand Green Roofs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 171<\/td>\n | Green Streets Portland’s Green Streets: Lessons Learned Retrofitting our Urban Watersheds <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 187<\/td>\n | Green Highways Green Streets\u2014An Opportunity to Transform Our Roads <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 197<\/td>\n | Legacy LID: Stormwater Treatment in Unimproved Embankments along Highway Shoulders in Western Washington <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 207<\/td>\n | Managing Street Runoff with Green Streets <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 217<\/td>\n | Rain Gardens and Green Streets: The Future of Municipal Stormwater Management <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 229<\/td>\n | Permeable Pavements Low Impact Development and Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavements: Working with Industry for Material Development and Training Offerings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 238<\/td>\n | Pervious Concrete Bicycle Lanes\u2014Roadway Stormwater Mitigation within the Right-of-Way <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 245<\/td>\n | Porous Concrete Sidewalks\u2014How to Build Sidewalks, Not Stormwater Ponds <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 254<\/td>\n | Pervious Pavement System Evaluation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 263<\/td>\n | Under-Pavement Infiltration Demonstration\u2014Decatur Street Low Impact Development Roadway Project <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 271<\/td>\n | Hydrologic and Water Quality Evaluation of Four Permeable Pavements in North Carolina, USA <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 281<\/td>\n | Rainwater Harvesting Integrating Rainwater Harvesting and Stormwater Management Infrastructure: Double Benefit-Single Cost <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 288<\/td>\n | Matching Rainwater Harvesting Strategies with Ecological Flow Needs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 298<\/td>\n | Performance of Rainwater Harvesting Systems in the Southeastern United States <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 306<\/td>\n | Study on the Economical Volume for Rainwater Harvesting <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 315<\/td>\n | Water Reuse and Harvesting Residential Manmade Lake System Design for Storm Water Treatment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 323<\/td>\n | Subsurface Wetland Systems for On-Site Wastewater Treatment and Reuse <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 332<\/td>\n | Study on Application of Gravity-Flow Compound Ecological Filter Bed in the Purification of Urban River Water <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 342<\/td>\n | Case Studies LID\u2014LEED\u2014Smart Growth A Case Study on the Use of LEED, LID, and BMPs in the Redevelopment of a Midwestern Urban Campus <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 352<\/td>\n | Case Study: Low Impact Development Retrofit at Pillar Point Air Force Station <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 363<\/td>\n | From the Mountains to the Coast\u2014LID Case Studies from North Carolina <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 373<\/td>\n | Implementation of Low Impact Development (LID) Practices in the District of Columbia: Lessons Learned <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 384<\/td>\n | Integration of Water Resource Planning into Stormwater Design <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 391<\/td>\n | Lincoln Center: Integrating Innovative Stormwater Management Technology into a Mixed Use Community <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 401<\/td>\n | Low Impact Development Wal-Mart in North Carolina <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 408<\/td>\n | Trade Winds Farm, Winchester, Connecticut\u2014How to Create a LID Subdivision <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 417<\/td>\n | Codes, Regulations, Constraints, Guidelines Codes Emerging State LID Regulatory Approaches and Compliance Tools for Local Governments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 427<\/td>\n | LID in Regulatory Water Pollution Control Programs: The District of Columbia Experience <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 433<\/td>\n | Mimicking Predevelopment Hydrology Using LID: Time for a Reality Check? <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 438<\/td>\n | Without a Standard, Low Impact Development Is Another Form of High Impact Development <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 447<\/td>\n | Impediments to Using LID and Examples of Removing Those Barriers\u2014From Public Acceptance to Regulatory Constraints Ahead of the Curve\u2014Tolland, Connecticut Adopts Low Impact Development Regulations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 457<\/td>\n | Seattle’s Policy and Pilots to Support Green Stormwater Infrastructure <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 461<\/td>\n | Transforming Gray to Green in the Right-of-Way: Blurring the Lines\u2026Softening the Edges <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 471<\/td>\n | Understanding and Overcoming Legal and Administrative Barriers to LID: A Florida Case Study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 481<\/td>\n | Using Rainwater to Grow Livable Communities: A New Tool to Promote Multi- Benefit BMPs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 491<\/td>\n | Successful Collaborative Funding Approaches to LID Organisational Change in Urban Stormwater Quality Management Programs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 501<\/td>\n | Using LID to Help Mitigate Impacts of Climate Change on Stormwater and Wastewater Systems Sustaining Ecological Processes in High Density Urban Sprawl Areas in China <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 511<\/td>\n | Computational Methods Existing Computational Methods Preparing a Pollution Loading Analysis for Land Development Projects <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 520<\/td>\n | Continuous Simulation of Integrated Bioretention-Infiltration Systems for Urban Retrofits <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 530<\/td>\n | Continuous Hydrology with Subbasin Specificity and LID: The Flow Duration Design Model <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 537<\/td>\n | Determining Cost Effective Pollution Reduction BMP Scenarios for Low Impact Redevelopment and a Watershed Plan Using WinSLAMM <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 556<\/td>\n | Development and Calibration of a High Resolution SWMM Model for Simulating the Effects of LID Retrofits on the Outflow Hydrograph of a Dense Urban Watershed LID Analysis Considerations in Western Washington <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 565<\/td>\n | Innovative Computation Tools A Practical Methodology to Evaluate Hydromodification Performance of Conventional and Low Impact Stormwater Controls <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 574<\/td>\n | A Simplified Approach for Sizing Green Stormwater Infrastructure in the City of Seattle <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 584<\/td>\n | The Road to LID Plan Approval in Coastal North Carolina: Development of a Spreadsheet Modeling Tool for LID Based Design <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 594<\/td>\n | Stochastic Analysis for the Effectiveness of BMP Implementation in a Watershed <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 604<\/td>\n | Education, Training, Outreach Commercial\/Industrial\/Incentives Programs Stormwater BMP Maintenance and Certification Program in North Carolina, USA <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 610<\/td>\n | LID Education, Training, Outreach with Single-Family Residents LID Design for a Residential Lot in the Truckee River Watershed, CA <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 617<\/td>\n | International Applications of LID <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 627<\/td>\n | International Experiences with Low Impact Development (LID) Design and Hydrologic Estimation Method of Multi-Purpose Rain Garden: Beijing Case Study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 637<\/td>\n | Growth of Low Impact Design in the Auckland Region (New Zealand) through an Innovative Grants Programme <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 649<\/td>\n | The Auckland Sustainability Framework, Urbanisation, and Low Impact Design in the Auckland Region (New Zealand) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 661<\/td>\n | Innovative Stormwater Management in Canada <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 671<\/td>\n | Sustainable Stormwater Management: Implementation of Pilot Low Impact Development Stormwater Controls at US Department of Defense Installations in Europe <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 680<\/td>\n | LID and Sustainability Green Infrastructure Assessing Sustainability for Urban Regeneration in a River Corridor\u2014Accounting for Climate Change <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 690<\/td>\n | Building the Marketplace for LID: A New Habitat-Based Approach <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 698<\/td>\n | Green Infrastructure for Urban Stormwater Management <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 705<\/td>\n | Low Impact Development in Utah: Progress, Constraints, and Future Outlook <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 715<\/td>\n | Seattle Public Utilities\u2019 Natural Drainage System Operation and Maintenance <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 721<\/td>\n | Stormwater Concepts\u2014No Adverse Impact <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 726<\/td>\n | The Low Impact Design Charrette: Engaging the Public and Expanding Green Stormwater Management in San Francisco <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 735<\/td>\n | LID and Stream Restoration A Watershed-Based Approach to Low Impact Development <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 745<\/td>\n | Effect of Bioretention on Runoff Temperature in Trout Sensitive Regions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 752<\/td>\n | Inventory and Prioritization of LID Projects at a Sub-Watershed Scale <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 763<\/td>\n | Stream Restoration through Stormwater Runoff Management and Retrofit: New Objectives, New Approaches <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 773<\/td>\n | Soils and Vegetation Ecological Functions Evaluation Study of Urban Landscape Construction Based on LID <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 785<\/td>\n | Improvements in Infiltration Rates of Compacted Soil with Tillage and Compost <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 792<\/td>\n | Pollutant Transport within the Vadose Zone of Natural Soils: With Focus on the Interactions of Individual Soil Horizons <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 801<\/td>\n | Start with the Soil: Changing Construction Site Soil and Vegetation Management in Washington <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 805<\/td>\n | LID Incentives for New Construction Cost Comparison\u2014Traditional vs. LID Cost-Benefit Evaluation of Ecoroofs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 815<\/td>\n | Incentives for Incorporating LID An Approach to Mainstreaming Low Impact Development (LID) Technology in Municipal Engineering Practices <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 825<\/td>\n | Integrated Water Management Demonstration Project for Low Impact Development Urban Retrofit and Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems in the Upper Patuxent River Watershed, Prince George\u2019s County, Maryland <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 835<\/td>\n | Reducing Stormwater Costs through LID Strategies and Practices <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 845<\/td>\n | Seattle’s Stormwater Facility Credit Program: Incentivizing Onsite Stormwater Management <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 854<\/td>\n | Recent Monitoring\/Performance Findings Bioretention Monitoring An Evaluation of Planting Soil Mixtures on Bioretention Cell Performance <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 864<\/td>\n | Bacterra by Filterra Advanced Bioretention System: Discussion of the Benefits, Mechanisms, and Efficiencies for Bacteria Removal <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 877<\/td>\n | Enhancing Rain Garden Design to Promote Nitrate Removal via Denitrification <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 887<\/td>\n | Bioretention Performance in the Upper Coastal Plain of North Carolina <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 897<\/td>\n | Estimation of Evapotranspiration and Groundwater Recharge from Bioretention Areas Using Weighing Lysimeters <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 904<\/td>\n | Four Levels of Assessment for LID Practices <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 913<\/td>\n | Integrated Practice Monitoring A Comparison of Conventional and Low Impact Development Stormwater Best Management Practices <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 923<\/td>\n | Field Evaluation of Hydrologic and Water Quality Benefits of Grass Swales with Check Dams for Managing Highway Runoff <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 931<\/td>\n | Field Evaluation of Level Spreaders for Runoff Reduction and Water Quality Impacts <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 941<\/td>\n | LID Performance Monitoring Challenges and Results for Infiltrating BMPs: Bioretention Cells, Raingardens, and Porous Pavements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 953<\/td>\n | Site Design Considerations LID Applications Design, Engineering, Installation, and O&M Considerations for Incorporating Stormwater Low Impact Development (LID) Practices in Urban, Suburban, Rural, and Brownfield Sites <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 963<\/td>\n | Kitsap SEED\u2014Marrying the Ultra-Modern with Zero-Discharge Requirements <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 971<\/td>\n | Lessons Learned: The North Carolina Backyard Rain Garden Program <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 980<\/td>\n | LID Feasibility, Design, and Implementation at Cape Lookout National Seashore <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 984<\/td>\n | Low-Impact Development and Coastal Waters: Can Public Health Standards Be Protected? <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 993<\/td>\n | Monitoring-Based Annual Water Balances as Targets for Minimal Impact Development <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1003<\/td>\n | Stormwater Management Conceived as Amenity: The Application of Artful Rainwater Design <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1014<\/td>\n | Watershed Retrofit with LID CSO Control and LID Advanced Drainage Concepts Using Green Solutions for CSO Control\u2014The KC Approach <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1025<\/td>\n | Enhancement of the Green Build-Out Model to Quantify Stormwater Reduction Benefits in Washington, DC <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1035<\/td>\n | Green Infrastructure Approaches to Control of Combined Sewer Overflows <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1046<\/td>\n | Risk Analysis Application for Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Low Impact Development for CSO Control Using LIDRA <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1056<\/td>\n | Exemplary Case Studies Creating a LID Environment in an Ultra Urban Setting <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1065<\/td>\n | Greening Stormwater Infrastructure: Integrating Low-Impact Development with Traditional Methods in Washington State <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1075<\/td>\n | Implementation of Low Impact Development Retrofits in a Low Income Neighborhood in Wilmington, NC <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1085<\/td>\n | Low Impact Development in San Diego\u2014Demonstration Projects and Proposed Urban Retrofits <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1095<\/td>\n | Mt. Airy Rain Catchers\u2014Rain Barrels and Gardens in a Suburban Watershed <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1105<\/td>\n | OHSU Stormwater Management Plan: A Unique Approach to Stormwater Management for Campus Facilities Using Low Impact Development <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1115<\/td>\n | Painting It Green\u2014Replacing an All-Pipe Solution with an Integrated Solution Emphasizing Low Impact Development <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1125<\/td>\n | Retrofitting an Urban Watershed\u2014Incentivizing and Incorporating LIDs One Parcel at a Time <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 1134<\/td>\n | Stormwater Retrofit at Mt. Tabor Middle School: Lessons Learned about Designing Landscape Systems at Schools <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Low Impact Development for Urban Ecosystem and Habitat Protection<\/b><\/p>\n |