BSI PD IEC TS 62607-9-1:2021:2022 Edition
$198.66
Nanomanufacturing. Key control characteristics – Traceable spatially resolved nano-scale stray magnetic field measurements. Magnetic force microscopy
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2022 | 66 |
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
2 | undefined |
4 | CONTENTS |
7 | FOREWORD |
9 | INTRODUCTION |
10 | Figures Figure 1 – Spatial resolution of magnetic stray field characterizationtechniques and their possible maximum scan area |
11 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions 3.1 General terms |
12 | 3.2 General terms related to magnetic stray field characterization |
13 | 3.3 Terms related to the measurement method described in this document |
18 | 3.4 Key control characteristics measured according to this document |
19 | 3.5 Symbols and abbreviated terms |
20 | 4 General 4.1 Measurement principle, general |
21 | Figure 2 – Field measurement with finite-size sensors |
22 | 4.2 Application to scanning systems, discretization 4.3 Preparation of the measurement setup 4.4 Measurement principle, MFM 4.4.1 General Figure 3 – Schematic MFM setup |
23 | 4.4.2 Field detection process 4.4.3 Lever correction function FLCF |
24 | Figure 4 – Lever correction function (FLCF) in Fourier space |
25 | 4.4.4 Effective magnetic charge density of the tip 4.4.5 Characteristics of the MFM FICF Figure 5 – Lever correction function (FLCF) and distance losses |
26 | 4.4.6 Concept of calibration by deconvolution Figure 6 – Instrument calibration function (FICF ) in real and Fourier space. Line plots of the partial Fourier space (absolute value, left) and real space (right). |
27 | 4.4.7 Regularized deconvolution approach |
28 | 4.5 MFM setup key control characteristics 4.5.1 General |
29 | 4.5.2 Cantilever spring constant C Tables Table 1 – MFM setup key control characteristics |
30 | 4.5.3 Cantilever resonance quality factor Q 4.5.4 Sensitivity of the detection and analysis electronics Figure 7 – Typical resonance curve of a cantilever |
31 | 4.5.5 Measurement height 4.5.6 Scan size, pixel resolution 4.5.7 Canting angle of the cantilever in the setup 4.5.8 Magnetization orientation of the tip Figure 8 – Typical amplitude–distance plot of a cantileverwith the linear transition region indicated |
32 | 4.5.9 Regularized deconvolution 4.6 Ambient conditions during measurement 4.7 Reference samples 4.7.1 General 4.7.2 “Well-known” and calculable reference sample 4.7.3 Band domain patterns as self-referencing calibration samples Table 2 – Ambient conditions key control characteristics |
33 | 4.7.4 Detailed stray field calculation procedure for perpendicularly magnetized band domain reference samples Figure 9 – Band domain reference sample |
34 | Table 3 – Stray field estimation key control characteristics |
35 | Table 4 – Stray field estimation protocol |
36 | 5 Measurement procedure for calibrated magnetic field measurements 5.1 Calibrated stray field measurement of a sample under test |
37 | 5.2 Detailed description of the measurement and calibration procedure 5.3 Measurement protocol |
38 | Table 5 – Measurement protocol |
39 | 5.4 Measurement reliability 5.4.1 Artefacts in MFM measurements 5.4.2 Artefacts resulting from strong stray field samples |
40 | 5.4.3 Artefacts when measuring samples with low coercivity 5.4.4 Distortion of the domain structure Figure 10 – Artefacts that occur if the tip magnetization is switchedby the stray field of the sample Figure 11 – Artefacts if the sample domain orientation is switchedby a strong tip stray field |
41 | 5.4.5 Contingency strategy 5.4.6 Strategies to improve the quality of the measurements 5.5 Uncertainty evaluation 5.5.1 General 5.5.2 Reference sample Figure 12 – Typical distortion of an MFM image: different domain widths |
42 | 5.5.3 ICF determination 5.5.4 Calibrated field measurement |
43 | 6 Data analysis / interpretation of results 6.1 Software for data analysis Table 6 – Uncertainty evaluation key control characteristics |
44 | Table 7 – Software implementation of stray field calculation of band domain samples Table 8 – Software-based realization of calibrated measurement |
45 | 7 Results to be reported 7.1 General 7.2 Product / sample identification 7.3 Test conditions 7.4 Measurement set-up specific information |
46 | 7.5 Test results 8 Validity assessment 8.1 General aspects |
47 | 8.2 Requirements 8.3 Example 8.3.1 Determination of the Instrument Calibration Function FICF |
48 | Figure 13 – Normalized Fourier amplitudes of the measured referencesample signal Δφref and the reference sample magnetic field |
49 | 8.3.2 Calibrated measurement Figure 14 – Typical transfer functions in Fourier and real space for different values of the regularization parameter α Figure 15 – Comparison of the reference sample signal Δφref and the SUT signal ΔφSUT |
51 | Annex A (informative)Algorithm A.1 Mathematical basics A.1.1 Continuous Fourier transform versus discrete Fourier Transform A.1.2 Partial (two-dimensional) Fourier space A.1.3 Cross correlation theorem |
52 | A.2 Magnetic fields in partial Fourier space A.2.1 Differentiation in partial Fourier space A.2.2 Magnetic fields in partial Fourier space A.3 Signal generation in magnetic force microscopy A.3.1 General |
53 | A.3.2 MFM phase shift signal |
54 | A.3.3 L-curve criterion for pseudo-Wiener filter-based deconvolution process |
55 | Figure A.1 – Plot of the 2-norm of the residual as a functionof the regularization parameter Figure A.2 – Example of an L-curve Figure A.3 – Illustration of the curvature of the L-curveas a function of the regularization parameter |
56 | Annex B (informative)Uncertainty evaluation B.1 Definition for instrument calibration B.2 Definition for calibrated field measurement |
57 | B.3 A type uncertainty evaluation B.4 B type uncertainty evaluation B.4.1 General B.4.2 Propagation of uncertainty from the real to the Fourier domain |
58 | B.4.3 Propagation of uncertainty from the Fourier to the real space domain |
59 | B.4.4 Uncertainty propagation based on the Wiener filter |
61 | B.4.5 Uncertainty evaluation for the tip calibration |
62 | B.4.6 Uncertainty evaluation for the stray field evaluation |
63 | B.5 Monte Carlo technique |
64 | Bibliography |