BSI PD IEC/TR 62866:2014
$215.11
Electrochemical migration in printed wiring boards and assemblies. Mechanisms and testing
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2014 | 96 |
This Technical Report describes the history of the degradation of printed wiring boards caused by electrochemical migration, the measurement method, observation of the failure and remarks to testing in detail.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
4 | English CONTENTS |
9 | FOREWORD |
11 | INTRODUCTION |
12 | 1 Scope 2 Electrochemical migration 2.1 Operation failure of electronic and electric equipment Figures Figure 1 – Main causes of insulation degradation in electronic equipment |
13 | 2.2 Name change of migration causing insulation degradation and nature of the degradation 2.2.1 History of naming with migration causing insulation degradation 2.2.2 Process of degradation by migration 2.3 Generation patterns of migration |
14 | Figure 2 – Generation patterns of migration |
15 | 3 Test conditions and specimens 3.1 Typical test methods Tables Table 1 – Standards for migration tests |
16 | 3.2 Specimens in migration tests 3.2.1 Design of test specimens Figure 3 – Basic comb pattern |
17 | Figure 4 – Comb type fine pattern Table 2 – Standard comb type pattern (based on IPC-SM-840) Table 3 – Comb fine pattern (based on JPCA BU 01) |
18 | Figure 5 – ECM group comb type pattern (mm) Figure 6 – Comb pattern for insulation resistance of flexible printed wiring board |
19 | Figure 7 – Insulation evaluation pattern for through-holes and via holes |
20 | Figure 8 – Details of the insulation evaluation pattern of Figure 7 (cross section of 4 and 5) Figure 9 – Test pattern of the migration study group Table 4 – Dimension of insulation evaluation pattern for through-holes |
21 | 3.2.2 Specifications and selection of specimen materials |
22 | 3.2.3 Remarks on the preparation of specimens 3.2.4 Storing of specimens 3.2.5 Pretreatment of the specimen (baking and cleaning) |
23 | 3.2.6 Care to be taken in handling specimens 3.3 Number of specimens required in a test 3.3.1 Specifications given in JPCA ET 01 Table 5 – Surface pretreatment to printed wiring board |
24 | 3.3.2 Number of specimens in a test 3.3.3 Number of specimens for the different evaluation purposes of a test Table 6 – Number of specimens (JPCA ET 01) Table 7 – Approximate number of specimens required depending on the purpose of the test |
25 | 4 Test methods 4.1 General 4.2 Steady state temperature and humidity test and temperature-humidity cyclic test 4.2.1 Purpose and outline of the test |
26 | 4.2.2 Test profile Figure 10 – Recommended profiles of increasing temperature and humidity |
27 | Figure 11 – Humidity cyclic profile (12 h + 12 h) |
28 | Figure 12 – Profiles of combined temperature-humidity cyclic test |
29 | 4.2.3 Test equipment Figure 13 – Structure of steady state temperature-humidity test equipment |
30 | 4.2.4 Remarks on testing |
31 | Figure 14 – Specimen arrangement and air flow in test chamber Table 8 – Ionic impurity concentration of wick (10–6) |
32 | 4.3 Unsaturated pressurized vapour test or HAST (highly accelerated temperature and humidity stress test) 4.3.1 Purpose and outline of the test Figure 15 – Effective space in a test chamber |
33 | 4.3.2 Temperature-humidity-pressure profile Figure 16 – HAST profile |
34 | 4.3.3 Structure of and remarks on the test equipment Figure 17 – Two types of HAST equipment and their structures |
35 | Figure 18 – Difference in failure time among different test laboratories |
36 | 4.3.4 Remarks on performing HAST Figure 19 – Colour difference of specimen surface among different laboratories (130 °C/85 %RH/DC 50 V) Table 9 – Insulation covering materials for cables for voltage application |
37 | Figure 20 – Resistance and pull-strength of cables used in HAST (130 °C 85 %RH) |
38 | 4.4 Saturated and pressurized vapour test 4.4.1 Purpose and outline of the test 4.4.2 Test profile 4.4.3 Remarks on test performing |
39 | 4.5 Dew cyclic test 4.5.1 Purpose and outline of the test 4.5.2 Dew cycle test temperature-humidity profile Figure 21 –Difference between unsaturated and saturation control of PCT equipment (relative humidity and average failure time) |
40 | 4.5.3 Structure of the test equipment 4.5.4 Remarks on the test method Figure 22 – Temperature-humidity profile of dew cycle test Table 10 – Dew cycle test condition |
41 | Figure 23 – Structure of dew test equipment |
42 | Figure 24 – Dew-forming temperature and dew size |
43 | 4.5.5 An example of migration in the solder flux from the dew cycle test Figure 25 – Board surface at the best dew formation condition Table 11 – Dew formation condition and dew size Table 12 – Dew cycle test condition |
44 | Figure 26 – Surface state before test Figure 27 – Surface state after 27 h Figure 28 – SEM image of specimen surface after the test |
45 | 4.6 Simplified ion migration tests 4.6.1 General 4.6.2 De-ionized water drop method Figure 29 – Element analysis of the surface after the test |
46 | Figure 30 – Circuit diagram of water drop test Figure 31 – Migration generated in the water drop test |
47 | 4.6.3 Diluted solution method Figure 32 – Electroerosion test method using the diluted solution |
48 | 4.7 Items to be noted in migration tests Figure 33 – Current and concentration of electrolytic solution Figure 34 – Precipitation on a specimen and its element analysis |
49 | Table 13 – Water quality for test Table 14 – Water quality change in steady-state temperature-humidity test (10–6) |
50 | Table 15 – Ionic impurities in voltage applying cables (10–6) |
51 | 5 Electrical tests 5.1 Insulation resistance measurement 5.1.1 Standards of insulation resistance measurement 5.1.2 Measurement method of insulation resistance Table 16 – Standards of insulation resistance measurement |
52 | Figure 35 – An example of insulation resistance measurement outside of the chamber |
53 | Figure 36 – Circuit diagram of insulation resistance measurement |
54 | 5.1.3 Special remarks on insulation resistance measurement Figure 37 – Examples of leakage current characteristics |
55 | Figure 38 – Relationship insulation resistance with charging time of capacitor mounted boards Figure 39 – Comparison of insulation resistance measurement inside and outside a test chamber |
56 | Figure 40 – Relative humidity and insulation resistance |
57 | 5.2 Measurement of dielectric characteristics 5.2.1 General 5.2.2 Dielectric characteristics of board surface Figure 41 – Effect of interruption of measurement on insulation resistance (variation of insulation resistance with the time left in atmospheric environment) |
58 | 5.2.3 Migration and dielectric characteristics of the printed wiring board surface |
59 | Figure 42 – Frequency response of dielectric characteristics of printed wiring board Figure 43 – Temperature response of dielectric characteristics of printed wiring board |
60 | Figure 44 – Changes of static capacitance and tan δ of a specimen through a deterioration test |
61 | 5.2.4 Evaluation of migration by AC impedance measurement Figure 45 – Test procedure of a dielectric characteristics test Figure 46 – Comparison of dielectric characteristics of two types of flux |
62 | 6 Evaluation of failures and analysis 6.1 Criteria for failures Figure 47 – Measurement principle of EIS (Electrical Insulation System) Figure 48 – Gold (Au) plating, non-cleaning |
63 | 6.2 Data analysis 6.2.1 Analysis of experimental data Figure 49 – Bath tub curve Table 17 – Criteria of migration failure by insulation resistance |
65 | 6.2.2 Relationship of the parameters in the experimental data and an example of the analysis |
66 | 6.2.3 Electric field strength distribution Figure 50 – Relation between the variation of insulation resistanceand the weight changes by water absorption |
67 | 6.3 Analysis of specimen with a failure, methods of analysis and case study 6.3.1 General Figure 51 – Distribution of electric field between line and plane Figure 52 – Distribution of the electric field between lines |
68 | 6.3.2 Cross section Figure 53 – Different observations of the same dendrite according todifferent cross section cutting planes |
70 | Figure 54 – An example of angle lapping |
71 | Figure 55 – Structure analysis of an angle lapped solder resist in the depth direction |
72 | 6.3.3 Optical observation Table 18 – Various methods for optical observation of failures |
74 | 6.3.4 Analysis methods 6.3.5 Defect observation and analysis Table 19 – Various methods for defect analysis |
75 | Figure 56 – Observed images of dendrite with different illumination methods (without solder resist) Figure 57 – EPMA analysis of migration (dendrite) on a comb type electrode |
76 | Figure 58 – EPMA analysis of migration (dendrite) in the solder resist |
77 | Figure 59 – 3D shape measuring system Figure 60 – Electrodes which migration was generated |
78 | Figure 61 – 3D observation of electrodes before and after the test |
79 | 6.4 Special remarks on the migration phenomenon after the test Figure 62 – 3D observation of dendrite Table 20 – Board specification and test conditions |
80 | Table 21 – Effect of the overlap of electrodes Table 22 – Effect of the area of the conductor |
81 | Table 23 – Effect of the shape of the tip of the electrodes |
82 | Annex A (informative) Life evaluation A.1 Voltage dependence of life A.2 Temperature dependence of life A.3 Humidity dependence of life A.3.1 General |
83 | A.3.2 Relation between temperature (°C), relative humidity ( %RH) and vapour pressure (hPa) A.4 Acceleration test of life and acceleration factor Figure A.1 – Temperature and saturated vapour pressure Table A.1 – Vapour pressure at test temperature and relative humidity |
84 | A.5 Remarks |
85 | Annex B (informative) Measurement of temperature-humidity B.1 Measurement of temperature and humidity B.1.1 General B.1.2 Commonly used temperature-humidity measurement systems and their merits B.1.3 Requirements for the humidity measurements in a steady-state temperature-humidity test chamber B.2 Typical methods of temperature and humidity measurement B.2.1 General |
86 | B.2.2 Checking procedure for temperature measurement Table B.1 – Merits of and remarks on various humidity measuring methods (applicable to steady state temperature-humidity tests) |
87 | B.2.3 Checking procedure for humidity measurement Figure B.1 – Specification of sensors used in the test and their shapes |
88 | B.2.4 Derivation of temperature in a chamber Figure B.2 – Calculation method of the average temperature (humidity), the average maximum temperature (humidity) and the average minimum temperature (humidity) |
89 | B.2.5 Definition of relative humidity in HAST Table B.2 – Derivation of relative humidity from dry-and-wet bulb humidity meter |
90 | Figure B.3 – Relative humidity in a pressurized chamber |
91 | Bibliography |